goldenbrightsun:

wielderofoak:

Forest Throne by ~Lorelyne

that is a krummhornhe’s playing a krummhornthose things literally sound like kazoos

goldenbrightsun:

wielderofoak:

Forest Throne by ~Lorelyne

that is a krummhorn
he’s playing a krummhorn
those things literally sound like kazoos

Reblog this
807 notes - Posted 15 hours ago

http://johnfuckingwatson.tumblr.com/post/93323145396/astudyinrose-the-idea-that-seeing-two-queer

astudyinrose:

The idea that seeing two queer people who are this high profile on screen be together is HARMFUL to the queer community absolutely baffles me.

The assertion that because it’s two cis white guys it “doesn’t go far enough” is absolute bullshit. I’m not saying that I don’t want…

Reblog this
272 notes - Posted 15 hours ago

granadabrettishholmes:

iamheathen:

emery-ashbel:

The guiding philosophy of all Sherlock Holmes adaptations in four words.

o m g


This too good.

granadabrettishholmes:

iamheathen:

emery-ashbel:

The guiding philosophy of all Sherlock Holmes adaptations in four words.

o m g

This too good.

Reblog this
1,113 notes - Posted 15 hours ago

witheringghost:

do you ever just kinda wonder what your selling point as a human being or friend is? like, what was the point at which people were like: hey, I’ll keep this human


Reblog this
24,486 notes - Posted 15 hours ago

tastefullyoffensive:

[slugbooks/sarahcandersen]
Reblog this
42,278 notes - Posted 15 hours ago

Reblog this
306,398 notes - Posted 15 hours ago

Reblog this
3,939 notes - Posted 15 hours ago

laugh-addict:

looking at egyptian gods

image

ya know

nothing big

(Source: robotemperor)


Reblog this
139,922 notes - Posted 15 hours ago

letter-experiment:

Largest amount of swag I have ever witnessed

letter-experiment:

Largest amount of swag I have ever witnessed

(Source: 4gifs)

Reblog this
795,022 notes - Posted 15 hours ago

becomebraver:

I HAVE FOUND THE CUTEST THING ON THE INTERNET

becomebraver:

I HAVE FOUND THE CUTEST THING ON THE INTERNET

Reblog this
78,239 notes - Posted 16 hours ago

Reblog this
61,103 notes - Posted 16 hours ago

harperhug:


#this looks like a still from an 80’s movie

You have no idea how long I had to look before I realized this was Emma Watson and Matthew Lewis.

harperhug:

#this looks like a still from an 80’s movie

You have no idea how long I had to look before I realized this was Emma Watson and Matthew Lewis.

Reblog this
140,868 notes - Posted 16 hours ago

lacigreen:

Was talking about #WomenAgainstFeminism today on Twitter, a trend that I see largely as a reaction to (1) extremist feminist politics found readily online and (2) ignorance/stereotypes about feminism.  I tried to handle my frustration with a bit humor but quickly realized this is actually a really emotionally-fraught topic for people.  Maybe not the time for sarcasm.Most the time, feminism in action doesn’t explicitly call itself feminism. I’m talking about things like campaigning for sex ed, same sex marriage, equal pay, maternity leave, reproductive health access, transgender health care, representation, implementing sexual assault/harassment policies, getting women into stem, etc. I think this confused void about what feminists *actually do and believe in* allows the space to be sensationalized by a loud, extreme minority and predatory media sources who see a “hot story”. Onlookers who don’t know their history or what feminism is (and don’t take a second to learn…) naturally take the bait and then end up railing against something that isn’t even an accurate representation of feminism in the first place. Then feminists are pissed, and anti-feminists are pissed (though misogynists are usually quite happy) and we’ve whipped ourselves up a nice divisive shitstorm of “whose side are you on”?I understand it’s unpopular amongst some feminists to concede that extremism exists; “there’s nothing wrong with radical action” and “they’re a part of the movement too”! I think those are valid points (and I certainly don’t think the solution is to silence/disown anyone), but I also think we have to admit that it can really alienate people from the cause, and perhaps #WomenAgainstFeminism is proof.  What do you think?

lacigreen:

Was talking about #WomenAgainstFeminism today on Twitter, a trend that I see largely as a reaction to (1) extremist feminist politics found readily online and (2) ignorance/stereotypes about feminism.  I tried to handle my frustration with a bit humor but quickly realized this is actually a really emotionally-fraught topic for people.  Maybe not the time for sarcasm.

Most the time, feminism in action doesn’t explicitly call itself feminism. I’m talking about things like campaigning for sex ed, same sex marriage, equal pay, maternity leave, reproductive health a
ccess, transgender health care, representation, implementing sexual assault/harassment policies, getting women into stem, etc. I think this confused void about what feminists *actually do and believe in* allows the space to be sensationalized by a loud, extreme minority and predatory media sources who see a “hot story”. Onlookers who don’t know their history or what feminism is (and don’t take a second to learn…) naturally take the bait and then end up railing against something that isn’t even an accurate representation of feminism in the first place. Then feminists are pissed, and anti-feminists are pissed (though misogynists are usually quite happy) and we’ve whipped ourselves up a nice divisive shitstorm of “whose side are you on”?

I understand it’s unpopular amongst some feminists to concede that extremism exists; “there’s nothing wrong with radical action” and “they’re a part of the movement too”! I think those are valid points (and I certainly don’t think the solution is to silence/disown anyone), but I also think we have to admit that it can really alienate people from the cause, and perhaps #WomenAgainstFeminism is proof.  What do you think?

Reblog this
4,642 notes - Posted 16 hours ago

Reblog this
6,601 notes - Posted 16 hours ago

Reblog this
39,756 notes - Posted 16 hours ago